AI Prediction King
AI Prediction Summary
| Nashville VS Chicago Fire | Prediction Result | Predicted Score | Total Goals | Goal Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Result | Win | 7:2 | 9 | 5 |
| Tencent Yuanbao | Win✓ | 2:1✗ | 3 | 1 |
| iFlytek Xinghuo | Win✓ | 2:1✗ | 3 | 1 |
| DeepSeek | Win✓ | 2:1✗ | 3 | 1 |
| ByteDance Doubao | Win✓ | 2:1✗ | 3 | 1 |
| Kimi | Win✓ | 2:1✗ | 3 | 1 |
| Baidu Wenxin | Win✓ | 2:1✗ | 3 | 1 |
| Alibaba Tongyi | Win✓ | 2:1✗ | 3 | 1 |
| Lingyi | Win✓ | 2:1✗ | 3 | 1 |
AI Detailed Analysis
Tencent Yuanbao
Actual Result:7:2
Win/Lose Prediction:Home Win✓ Correct Prediction
Score Prediction:2:1✗ Wrong Score
All Possible Scores and Probabilities:
| Probability | Score | Goal Difference | Total Goals |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30% | 2:1 | 1 | 3 |
| 25% | 3:1 | 2 | 4 |
| 20% | 2:0 | 2 | 2 |
| 15% | 3:2 | 1 | 5 |
| 10% | 1:1 | 0 | 2 |
Detailed Analysis:
Nashville SC’s stable recent form and strong home resilience shine. Their layered attacking system and cohesive coordination, with minimal injury impact on their main lineup, contrast with Chicago Fire’s defensive vulnerabilities and fatigue from long away travel. Historical encounters slightly favor Nashville. Their coach’s adaptability and decent bench strength, with neutral pitch conditions and varied schedule impacts, predict a victory, though Chicago’s upset potential remains.
iFlytek Xinghuo
Actual Result:7:2
Win/Lose Prediction:Home Win✓ Correct Prediction
Score Prediction:2:1✗ Wrong Score
All Possible Scores and Probabilities:
| Probability | Score | Goal Difference | Total Goals |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35% | 2:1 | 1 | 3 |
| 25% | 1:0 | 1 | 1 |
| 15% | 2:0 | 2 | 2 |
| 10% | 3:2 | 1 | 5 |
| 15% | 1:1 | 0 | 2 |
Detailed Analysis:
Nashville SC’s stable recent form, strong home ability, mature tactical system, and cohesive coordination outshine Chicago Fire’s fluctuating away performances and defensive weaknesses. Nashville’s slight historical and psychological edge predicts a 2:1 or 1:0 victory.
DeepSeek
Actual Result:7:2
Win/Lose Prediction:Home Win✓ Correct Prediction
Score Prediction:2:1✗ Wrong Score
All Possible Scores and Probabilities:
| Probability | Score | Goal Difference | Total Goals |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35% | 2:1 | 1 | 3 |
| 25% | 1:0 | 1 | 1 |
| 20% | 3:1 | 2 | 4 |
| 15% | 2:0 | 2 | 2 |
| 5% | 1:1 | 0 | 2 |
Detailed Analysis:
Nashville SC’s stable home form, with three wins and two draws in their last five home games, leverages wing crosses and set-piece tactics, with forward Mukhtar in hot form, scoring in three consecutive matches. Chicago Fire’s away defensive vulnerabilities, conceding 1.8 goals per game in their last three away matches, are compounded by injuries, with main center-back Pineda sidelined. Fire’s midfield core Giménez shines in organization, but their injury-hit backline struggles. Nashville’s perfect home record against Fire in their last three encounters provides psychological confidence. Nashville’s intact lineup and Chicago’s fatigue from consecutive away games predict Nashville’s dominance, with Fire seeking counterattacking chances but Nashville’s stronger chance creation securing a narrow victory.
ByteDance Doubao
Actual Result:7:2
Win/Lose Prediction:Home Win✓ Correct Prediction
Score Prediction:2:1✗ Wrong Score
All Possible Scores and Probabilities:
| Probability | Score | Goal Difference | Total Goals |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30% | 2:1 | 1 | 3 |
| 20% | 3:1 | 2 | 4 |
| 15% | 1:1 | 0 | 2 |
| 10% | 2:0 | 2 | 2 |
| 5% | 3:2 | 1 | 5 |
Detailed Analysis:
Nashville SC’s good recent form, cohesive coordination, and home advantage, bolstered by fan support, boost morale. Chicago Fire’s strength but away challenges lag. Nashville’s deep squad, stable tactical execution, and strong coaching adaptability predict a 2:1 victory, with their attack creating more chances and defense limiting opponents.
Kimi
Actual Result:7:2
Win/Lose Prediction:Home Win✓ Correct Prediction
Score Prediction:2:1✗ Wrong Score
All Possible Scores and Probabilities:
| Probability | Score | Goal Difference | Total Goals |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30% | 2:1 | 1 | 3 |
| 25% | 1:0 | 1 | 1 |
| 20% | 1:1 | 0 | 2 |
| 15% | 3:1 | 2 | 4 |
| 10% | 0:0 | 0 | 0 |
Detailed Analysis:
Nashville SC’s strong MLS season, particularly at home, leverages efficient defensive counterattacking and passionate fan support to dominate. Chicago Fire’s conservative tactics, reliant on defensive stability but lacking attacking creativity, struggle away with dense schedules and fatigue. Nashville’s good player form, high coordination, and minimal injuries predict dominance, with a 2:1 score most likely.
Baidu Wenxin
Actual Result:7:2
Win/Lose Prediction:Home Win✓ Correct Prediction
Score Prediction:2:1✗ Wrong Score
All Possible Scores and Probabilities:
| Probability | Score | Goal Difference | Total Goals |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60% | 2:1 | 1 | 3 |
| 25% | 1:1 | 0 | 2 |
| 15% | 1:2 | -1 | 3 |
Detailed Analysis:
Nashville SC and Chicago Fire are closely matched MLS rivals. Historical records show traded wins, but Nashville’s more stable recent form and mature tactical system provide consistency. Nashville’s superior attacking efficiency, creating more chances and higher shot accuracy, outshines Chicago’s balanced squad. Home-and-away psychological factors and potential key player injuries may impact the outcome, but simulations suggest Nashville’s narrow victory.
Alibaba Tongyi
Actual Result:7:2
Win/Lose Prediction:Home Win✓ Correct Prediction
Score Prediction:2:1✗ Wrong Score
All Possible Scores and Probabilities:
| Probability | Score | Goal Difference | Total Goals |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35% | 2:1 | 1 | 3 |
| 25% | 1:0 | 1 | 1 |
| 20% | 2:0 | 2 | 2 |
| 15% | 1:1 | 0 | 2 |
| 5% | 3:1 | 2 | 4 |
Detailed Analysis:
Nashville SC’s historical edge against Chicago Fire shines at home. Their possession-based and quick counterattacking tactics contrast with Fire’s wing-focused breakthroughs. Nashville’s hot core players and high coordination, with Chicago’s injury-hit lineup impacting stability, favor Nashville. Home fan support and Chicago’s travel fatigue, with Nashville’s unbeaten run and Fire’s fluctuations, predict a victory.
Lingyi
Actual Result:7:2
Win/Lose Prediction:Home Win✓ Correct Prediction
Score Prediction:2:1✗ Wrong Score
All Possible Scores and Probabilities:
| Probability | Score | Goal Difference | Total Goals |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30% | 2:1 | 1 | 3 |
| 25% | 1:1 | 0 | 2 |
| 20% | 2:0 | 2 | 2 |
| 15% | 1:0 | 1 | 1 |
| 10% | 3:1 | 2 | 4 |
Detailed Analysis:
Historically, Nashville SC’s slight edge against Chicago Fire, particularly at home, shines. Their 4-2-3-1 system, emphasizing midfield control and rapid wing and central advances, tears apart defenses. Chicago Fire’s 4-3-3 system, with midfield pressing and quick counterattacks, lacks defensive stability. Nashville’s hot attacking midfielders and forwards, with minimal injuries, contrast with Chicago’s injury concerns. Home fan support boosts Nashville, while Chicago’s travel fatigue and weaker away form lag. Nashville’s unbeaten run, edge in possession, shots, and passing accuracy, with coaching adaptability and deeper bench, predicts a 2:1 victory.